BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Chen QZ, Chi X, Pan JH, Cheng QZ, Guo YJ, Liu YX, Yu L, Feng WK. Integrating traditional Chinese medicine with pancreatic cancer organoids: Bibliometric insights and translational perspectives. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(10): 123966 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.123966]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
On behalf of all co-authors, I would like to express our sincere gratitude to the entire editorial team for your professionalism and efficiency throughout the review and publication process of our manuscript (MS 123966), titled "Integrating traditional Chinese medicine with pancreatic cancer organoids: Bibliometric insights and translational perspectives". From initial submission to final acceptance and online publication, we were impressed by the rigor of the peer-review process. The reviewers provided constructive and insightful comments that significantly improved the quality of our work. The editorial staff, including Ms. Meng-Liu Luo and Dr. Yue-Yuan Lei, were prompt, courteous, and highly organized in their communication, which made the production phase smooth and stress-free. We particularly appreciate the journal's efficient workflow—from provisional acceptance to proofreading and final publication in Volume 18, Issue 10. The entire experience has reinforced our confidence in publishing with World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. We wish the journal continued success and growth in the field of gastrointestinal oncology.